Received: from mail.cmpwn.com (mail.cmpwn.com [45.56.77.53])
	by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3DC782C50
	for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri,  6 Mar 2020 18:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn;
	t=1583518865; bh=oq336LZKDsnno8YU1sQhuiPfmsN58NaEisQjxKkN9qE=;
	h=In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:From:To;
	b=Rp8RkfE3j8IHRaQUYIaXJNpifejCbrGrjpVyCEMX4Jg8v4sds2IqlPGKYWdIEsRNS
	 LcH0exyhiBmr2wI8Au6hm4hbn+4bK0xZzcHfZfDNE6IZDpWegCJpSK0ZuL83Stltp8
	 nmuLg4JeWyGraN/qGuo5q6Ap8hn2EJx7QrT/g97Y=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In-Reply-To: <4c140756-b287-48a0-9d81-bc7421f72743@localhost>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:20:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Does it make sense to keep ~alpine/aports running?
From: "Drew DeVault" <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: "Ariadne Conill" <ariadne@dereferenced.org>, "Rasmus Thomsen"
 <oss@cogitri.dev>, "Cosmo Borsky" <me@cosmoborsky.com>, "~alpine/devel"
 <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Message-Id: <C13YKSQPRJ9U.49JNVX9IZ8E0@homura>

On Fri Mar 6, 2020 at 12:35 PM, Ariadne Conill wrote:
> A key point here that others have not raised is that this would require
> either moving the gitlab CI to use builds.sr.ht or maintaining two sets
> of CI. I doubt either is truly worth it, as the alternate CI is probably
> less featureful in gitlab.

The CI's are different and have different feature-sets. I am certain
that builds.sr.ht is perfectly suitable for aports CI.