Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180210113628.0b5fa8a4@mechanicum.chadwicks.me.uk>
References: <CA+T2pCGFeh30aEi43hAvJ3yoHBijABy_U62wfjhVmf3FmbNUUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180209211237.19ab8fda@ncopa-macbook.copa.dup.pw> <CA+T2pCGVM0jRKnh_2e=bi525uWdVpvUAK1U3Am0MipTYCCJmvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180210113628.0b5fa8a4@mechanicum.chadwicks.me.uk>
From: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:40:28 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+T2pCGMhOkxi5ZhGZbmt=m1WHsWpaN1NQidadC5sNMMh56PfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Proposed change: openssl 1.1 as default system
 openssl implementation
To: Kevin Chadwick <m8il1ists@gmail.com>
Cc: alpine-dev <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 5:36 AM, Kevin Chadwick <m8il1ists@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 14:15:38 -0600
>
>
>> > I just learned that the time_t issue is resolved:
>> > https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/362ffef32c0fcae703d57838e9f5704240a63213
>>
>> According to who?  They just try to make the math still work with
>> time_t.  The only way to be truly conformant is to use TAI64N math.
>>
>> William
>
> Hi William
>
> Perhaps you could clarify on the openbsd misc list?
>
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=151826186428121&w=2
>
> I use long long/uint64_t on my embedded development and don't build for
> linux so personally I don't understand especially with

This mailing list is for the discussion of Alpine Linux, not OpenBSD.
It appears you do not use Alpine nor develop Alpine, so why exactly
are you here?
For anyone else wanting to killfile this troll, note he also posts
from a yahoo.co.uk domain.

William


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---