X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2825C468C for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 02:18:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p22so103529033qka.3 for ; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:18:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dereferenced-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1gbkcwz7aYIcJqAdp58hoCeV4qut/Gj5XT48/n2FEKM=; b=1ouy7trxlki/HqXXN1HjQc0xC9yDw28XS5OSu19gQjXKbJmFdqOYZTBMuFW9GgWvx4 Y/+PTIpeVHWYcMXshzpgJ5pl1ja7kee+1So5xnfzqfeTh7YQA96gFZxFCvWtG1cZGE4U 3qThnqu/iUVXN96XkpQI/kUpqeCYB/2bvwsgoJZhdBxzWte4+g9YseyO0ipqeGUXqY/q YsOrqFIkMqJc6qCVAb3IKv6yEDBs3tJIp695Aw+D5ZERgIa+11qTOqjP/QqrkR76heLZ HNdGnnf7Lw0R4hw7R6SrppEKvoHNOb003sWvPLduyjmgSv5hLLCMxLiB9UK6M0glX467 m/og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1gbkcwz7aYIcJqAdp58hoCeV4qut/Gj5XT48/n2FEKM=; b=FYQTuaOmg0BCqilwGNcpqzHk4qBLFbJn9XV1MO1fVdmC4yWw3FXhOgozfOqOnQ/6Ze HhVJpckvOPzWm0XoG4YFOGOEHLAYrp79X68lPA2LJtk8MNm5JZcemZ6VkCJrjuFVZ9W5 EYo+o8kIVw4+kLSBNIOpB+LP2y9tp9ZHRc4q4YJgc45k0AAwgoEtxXcddbPRMznUWPP8 ACLifHAy9nPhULg5OdinanHOgZy7LA1ePlnfypy072mb0UdrCD3NX6z/KEPXZm0m+dMj KBWI1KVK9rQLfvd0UekSfzw0HB17EyAE+nVUUQEzUuxCBMy37CrbUNzFZUS99ai06CDg 0jvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H107Zxv/4drdXksTDwo9IvIGZO9w0P8dyae0LfyZLY7MFGrKZPb7h0Vr4bSuBaJASPovmN12RAFdk6v6g== X-Received: by 10.55.203.67 with SMTP id d64mr1440484qkj.72.1491185896482; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:18:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.50.49 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:18:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6cb1b9fe292e94575683ea97bafe2c61@alpinelinux.org> References: <6cb1b9fe292e94575683ea97bafe2c61@alpinelinux.org> From: William Pitcock Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 21:18:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] grsec go or no-go call for 3.6 To: Francesco Colista Cc: alpine-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Francesco Colista wrote: > Il 2017-04-02 00:39 William Pitcock ha scritto: >> >> Hello, >> >> It is getting to the point to decide whether we wish to continue >> including grsec kernel for 3.6. >> There are three options that I can see: >> >> 1. Ship grsec in Alpine 3.6 and see what happens. Revisit this issue >> in Alpine 3.7. > > > One of the paradigm of Alpine is "secure". > grsec contributed so far in making Alpine "secure". How has grsec improved the security of aarch64, ppc64le or s390x? It has been previously proposed to remove grsec at the same time that we remove support for 32-bit x86, should that ever happen. > I would not make any important decision based on a "possibility", rahter on > official announcements. Unfortunately, we do need to make a decision. While it is true that upstream may ultimately decide to not withdraw the testing patches, it can very easily go the other way. Upstream's rationale for withdrawing the testing patches have to do with the KSPP project (which is basically incrementally reimplementing grsec in mainline), which has the possibility of negatively impacting revenue. Of course, upstream is still invited to comment on whether or not he ultimately plans to withdraw the patches or not. William --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---