X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F442DC01A0; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j34so3252958qco.37 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:29:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qwiiEcblLUlMtqcsJj+9EK4v+uxcNOd8Sv70d/TnxnY=; b=EMu5H99wVQj39O1Vtqf9QLaj4ogtFRyfawznFgh6a34JrBccpfWKQd1QI9ePGOxY7E NU822/Ew2X8sVq82M5x6LuoIM/ei6YjAiNahkYLBHkIAIKjDAgQAJxMUiO1n8npJDGcm k0U1wiewOtOt4OGUQbXe6nzGEU1Yvh0Q1R1I8n0xo7fFBMIQIl1SWnPtqDiRZJ1xYV9K 4k/WNzpDCFy1LTaa/UprhSIdx8iwmq/INOF3xB67BOU4Q/E8ww8zhfUsXi/gaqjCyAQe 9m3KLetigXQ8UJQkP/drF0p27rCrpiVEcEuQ2B5jZDF/fDuUSVUXjqoE/wEDKbjbNO3t CtqQ== X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.105.73 with SMTP id gk9mr18136933qeb.40.1358677793668; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.119.228 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:29:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121129152317.69585a4f@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> References: <20121129152317.69585a4f@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:29:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Ideas for a new config framework, ACF2 From: Florian Heigl To: Natanael Copa Cc: Alpine ACF , Alpine Developers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b677894417f0c04d3b5d3a1 --047d7b677894417f0c04d3b5d3a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I hope it's OK to be so late on the thread... 2012/11/29 Natanael Copa > Hi, > > Me and Kaarle have been playing with the idea "what if we started with > ACF from scratch today, how would it be?". > > We collected some ideas and have now come up with a fairly detailed > plan for an ACF2. > > One of my first questions regarding ACF was if it supported managing multiple servers (that have ACF configured) from one console. Maybe you can discuss it for a moment when you next look at ACF2 ideas. I think in the "free" world only m0n0wall ever had that feature, but since it came to my mind very early I think it's something that many people would enjoy. Greets Florian --047d7b677894417f0c04d3b5d3a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I hope it's OK to be so late on the thread...

2012/11/29 Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Hi,

Me and Kaarle have been playing with the idea "what if we started with=
ACF from scratch today, how would it be?".

We collected some ideas and have now come up with a fairly detailed
plan for an ACF2.


One of my first q= uestions regarding ACF was if it supported managing multiple servers (that = have ACF configured) from one console.
Maybe you can discuss it f= or a moment when you next look at ACF2 ideas. I think in the "free&quo= t; world only m0n0wall ever had that feature, but since it came to my mind = very early I think it's something that many people would enjoy.

Greets
Florian=A0
--047d7b677894417f0c04d3b5d3a1-- --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---