X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1EEBDC148E for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so30336877iad.13 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:28:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fuW8/dm7JwGYcji+raTfHdlY6T75vlP6MgSYAegx8AQ=; b=pPDDoY4yEJ2mZoHfbRvDxZRQkChdyghbBClnb1TRdrsjGIDc1FroA3m9CZaRsSNypE +35+WC7OVanGhAN3VkY7jspHSSjOx8irSZr9oJNkZlha+Kb6SU47fLVx/FeByZRvRlRg uE6HKpHyzMyl8IZ8GIu7SZdhItTVKuQCydgSM= X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.154.7 with SMTP id o7mr37888163icw.48.1325183294700; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:28:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.229.7 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:28:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1325182586-2051-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@entel.upc.edu> References: <1325182586-2051-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@entel.upc.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:28:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] [PATCH] alpine-conf: modify setup-interfaces to create simple bridges From: Florian Heigl To: Roger Pau Monne Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, 2011/12/29 Roger Pau Monne : > Modified setup-interfaces to create simple bridges (works only with > one interface per bridge). Useful when setting up a Xen system, since > interfaces need to be bridged in order for guests to have networking. > Some distributions automatically create one bridge for each interface > when Xen is installed, but I think this is too aggressive. Yup, I think that is deprecated by xen devs too. The XL stack tries to avoid messing with the OS networking setup. It used to be a PITA if you have many bridges. Does anyone have OpenVswitch on Alpine yet? Because in practice I'll often have lacp+vlans and then quite a few bridges per Vlan, things being made worse by issues with the bridges (low general performance and lacp load balancing) Greetings, Florian --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---