X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 225FFDC0413 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so6234243pbc.13 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:08:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iNBiVPXBZOGcSw05KD3R+4//ea/t7k1y2hS80wK6MX0=; b=VMwt2PkRs8HfdsjvfsCWgIdyOo6iZcnkpyImJI6r6VJVgTWuk/0KtGhOVKaBaAkOfn 5tjwMcaSv7rhgiUp4zh1NLB96Hpelx7Jeb1XpXDE/XbX6Dy6v16pXTfRkzGnmCXbszuh rL0LS3Z/25GSMElBlwmpi+KvMgmIkv4lpmCB0Gi7II5Qb2M46Y1xruB5PXHJ9w5mcyAa lI9nD7rs1rPS0ChsfYEQCNKGqXXlVliDd/Y/Ury4WZPZW6EPb2KhcbUo58WllGl9Yivl AFtgFKdA0VlqmlNyySbc6scmp2ams64Dvd3s/AT0rssGNQy422Cc0WVJ6JpJf38YC9E7 aUQA== X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.232.231 with SMTP id tr7mr25353380pbc.63.1334556517011; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.141.231 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:08:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1334300016.25030.15.camel@df1844j> <20120413221535.16060469@alpinelinux.org> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] edge 120403: bug in netfilter? From: Leonardo Arena To: Natanael Copa Cc: Alpine-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Leonardo Arena wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Natanael Copa wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:53:36 +0200 >>> Anybody noticed the same issue, or am I missing something obvious? >> >> Did you add the interface to any zone? > > Yes, of course. Zones, Interfaces and Policy are fully configured. > Doesn't look like it's a Shorewall issue, as I was able to reproduce > it with iptables only. "iptables -L E2fw -vn shows that the ACCEPT rule isn't matched (0 pkts). I can observe the same behaviour with the following rule too: ACCEPT inet:$MYIP fw udp 514 Incoming syslog packets aren't matched by the rule. It seems that they are dropped early. All dropped packets are logged via "info" but I don't see any dropped packet in busybox syslog. - leonardo --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---