X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110DFDC00C6 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 01:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m6so2540779wiv.14 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:23:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uXMTJAbCSCKYHuezWpHh3NpOEyu1rHI2VCBUCJd/kzI=; b=0dKgx5EtaI2MBFv2woaWSYyGgjqXdFt0tmJUEHUfGZQvnJNMgdQXt4CVzfeb+I8vXt bc0cqsZUHJGmJyMOQ7ieeIYSjC57e8aepEKfCqfymfFORJOEU2Iga0r7vyivR6F5zvzY vpvX46BUYipZF6YLSi2I7tZDp9/V2AB0VpEZpjhOvNchcN7fkvGPWWmxNAGLoLxR343G u+Uwai2y3NGaf40KxmwKiMtA62sZgJbjbndQbyWHfXNG5DS77BDm/h7IRR5vXWAXk3Ge B0E2d63K7aaS5X9tdyep3eRISDlTZcvW5PmheURPsmFO4hsvCfkly8fgF6TcibtBYmnq 0PfQ== X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.240 with SMTP id bz16mr10535031wib.24.1372641816451; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.72.199 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:23:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130628165851.78af1a76@vostro> References: <20130628165851.78af1a76@vostro> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:23:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] ARM support From: Jeff Bilyk To: Timo Teras Cc: Alpine Development , William Pitcock Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7b40dfa35104e069139c --f46d043c7b40dfa35104e069139c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've done a couple attempts at building uclibc based alpine on ARM, but I didn't end up with a completed toolchain yet. My progress was documented on my user's talk page on wiki.alpinelinux.org, but I paused when musl work was commited to the aports tree. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Timo Teras wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to collect info on who are working on the ARM port, and what > the status of that work is? > > I'm semi-interested on working it too... > > I at least saw musl pushed to edge/main with arm arch specified, so at > least something seems to be happening. Is there working cross compiler > chain, or working alpine base image? > > Basically, I just got raspberry pi and would be interested to run > alpine on it along with the video core stuff - should be now doable > with the open sourced shim. We still need to ship the binary blob for > videocore which implements all the interesting stuff... but the main > arm side can be compiled from scratch. Additionally we'd need the > patched kernel, so getting grsec might not be feasible. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Timo > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > > -- Jeff --f46d043c7b40dfa35104e069139c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've done a couple attempts at building uclibc based a= lpine on ARM, but I didn't end up with a completed toolchain yet. =A0My= progress was documented on my user's talk page on wiki.alpinelinux.org, but I paused when musl work w= as commited to the aports tree.


On Fri, Jun 2= 8, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi> wrote:
Hi,

I'm trying to collect info on who are working on the ARM port, and what=
the status of that work is?

I'm semi-interested on working it too...

I at least saw musl pushed to edge/main with arm arch specified, so at
least something seems to be happening. Is there working cross compiler
chain, or working alpine base image?

Basically, I just got raspberry pi and would be interested to run
alpine on it along with the video core stuff - should be now doable
with the open sourced shim. We still need to ship the binary blob for
videocore which implements all the interesting stuff... but the main
arm side can be compiled from scratch. Additionally we'd need the
patched kernel, so getting grsec might not be feasible.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
=A0Timo


---
Unsubscribe: =A0alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---




--
Jeff
--f46d043c7b40dfa35104e069139c-- --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---