Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALV+NPkpqGBqv8knOsHnjhz6+B4FD-MY-sxyWN3A2tuS3U7UDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181127123601.1e845428@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: <20181127123601.1e845428@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmVybmhhcmQgSi4gTS4gR3LDvG4=?= <bernhard.gruen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:34:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CALV+NP=eZx_kwswf0apTqzmwky1bSZy6Xf6BFRvYLiE6JwQP+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Docker 18.09.0 available as aport
To: ncopa@alpinelinux.org
Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009cb76f057ba9b5a6"

--0000000000009cb76f057ba9b5a6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Di., 27. Nov. 2018 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Natanael Copa <
ncopa@alpinelinux.org>:

> On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 12:13:47 +0100
> Bernhard J. M. Gr=C3=BCn <bernhard.gruen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> > One advantage of this new packaging will be that one is able to run
> > containerd and / or runc without using docker. I think I already read
> some
> > comments / wishes about this on IRC.
>
> I think this sounds like a good idea, in general. the only thing I
> think can be a challenge is that docker may require a very specific
> version of containerd and runc.
>

Yes. That could happen. But I don't think this will happen because docker
did major work to get rid of internal dependencies on containerd and runc.
And if it ever happens that there is a new version of containerd or runc
that wont be compatible with docker for a longer time we could surely also
create a second version of containerd if really needed.
It also seems that other distributions package it in the same way.

best regards,

Bernhard J. M. Gr=C3=BCn

--0000000000009cb76f057ba9b5a6
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">Am Di., 27. No=
v. 2018 um 12:36=C2=A0Uhr schrieb Natanael Copa &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ncopa=
@alpinelinux.org">ncopa@alpinelinux.org</a>&gt;:<br></div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 12:13:47 +0100<br>
Bernhard J. M. Gr=C3=BCn &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bernhard.gruen@gmail.com" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">bernhard.gruen@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Hey,<br>&gt; One advantage of this new packaging will be that one is a=
ble to run<br>
&gt; containerd and / or runc without using docker. I think I already read =
some<br>
&gt; comments / wishes about this on IRC.<br>
<br>
I think this sounds like a good idea, in general. the only thing I<br>
think can be a challenge is that docker may require a very specific<br>
version of containerd and runc.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes. Th=
at could happen. But I don&#39;t think this will happen because docker did =
major work to get rid of internal dependencies on containerd and runc.</div=
><div>And if it ever happens that there is a new version of containerd or r=
unc that wont be compatible with docker for a longer time we could surely a=
lso create a second version of containerd if really needed.</div><div>It al=
so seems that other distributions package it in the same way.</div><div><br=
></div><div>best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Bernhard J. M. Gr=C3=BCn=
</div></div></div>

--0000000000009cb76f057ba9b5a6--


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---