X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27640DC0EB4 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so3216212lag.13 for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XBe4CeSkepDjTJ7catp+Qqv/34gVgqwrxAo2QLmQ7bw=; b=YmHTFZXHDBe8g6nAEh8JIOfKhAsptgd+1KvzkzXeR9ywVzFEIf4e4c6NKdXziZNBFB rAopRfTzQ2BRHUU8LyW46Stib1+w/aJfc9h+M6LVKpzn81heXNTo6fDD+Gny9pNAChof BN2TtYwkALbhiHw8+EA6x8nidB1HnoHJc1giTkkow8yuuOJjBt3rGmNb4zSfU4Z6JFYc m1aRlMJCMaqYoGgykLy7oX842eiH6SKXSTFqqMjghMy5hY6c22zOouvL/ffzv729an3Z crOegJmGJHEO+8ToQp0wVLaRilMrHnTkdloM4LJQKEVkC6d8M2zc4x7sM1+ooWdmNUZG obKg== X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.100 with SMTP id ip4mr8714248lab.1.1333718119939; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.106.3 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 06:15:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120406160622.2db84f05@vostro> References: <20120406160622.2db84f05@vostro> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:15:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] APK version formats From: Kiyoshi Aman To: Timo Teras Cc: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2012/4/6 Timo Teras : > So the question is with 1.2.3_01 versions if it's more trouble to > mangle them (to 1.2.3.01; 1.2.3_p01; or similar) without causing too > much trouble. Or if we should just accept 1.2.3_01 as-is. At least it > would not cause any problems to sort them properly. Personally, I think that manually mangling version numbers is inappropriate. In addition to the above proposal, I'd also like to recommend that apk-tools itself mangle oddball version numbers so the APKBUILD can always contain the true and correct version number. --Kiyoshi Aman --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---