X-Original-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-devel@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E66DCA6FA for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4227ADC1491 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so72633164wij.0 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TzOhONhcwCC127IX2Bkj3joz53Lqy+Jh3xyNRAUpHCk=; b=ekqRRLcdC4GKMT2IqweVzZEE3sSiO7JP50eSYvDnfmlUCTvTNqL7C9y3tMWU4ryWSq b9GZy27sDsJZp7MvaIOw7KAMwdyWb473lyqzotoglRCuRxusixT5YKz0ncxRiC3RMqUr +SHj+OP/Oj5eqXgcBLEYjNah30QDWwyKtEXr0VS2lripAKXckS+QbXlPeFAAcmmBq4iD sFII22xj/rV7W9+StBdgsYaaEEQAhU8cimTdcCK0nMNsOvxfapMtk5SLFtXS/v9s6BL8 67qsv0Bz39/gZmGmPFUXNbHnYNl7ZTQNmNBlx3hs7C628EkAHmcthHhuIzZjmx4bKCTj 9Sqw== X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.184.73 with SMTP id es9mr33355017wjc.122.1445197597549; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.22.136 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20151018202520.471ac3d7@ncopa-laptop> References: <20151018202520.471ac3d7@ncopa-laptop> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:46:37 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Rename proposal of alpine .ISOs From: Alan Pillay To: Natanael Copa Cc: 7heo <7heo@mail.com>, AlpineLinux ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP I actually still burn .ISO to CD, but maybe that's just me? An option would be to provide both the .iso and the dd'able image. But I'm not sure if the developers have enough infrastructure for this double release. Discussion has been all about the release format so far, but how do you guys feel about the proposal of making the MINI image become the STANDARD image? I think the great majority of people don't use Alpine as a router/firewall/etc anymore and the current standard image comes with many programs only a few people use. On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Natanael Copa wrote: > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:16:56 +0200 > 7heo <7heo@mail.com> wrote: > >> I would also get rid of the iso format as the main one, as nobody >> burns installation medias anymore. It would be much better to have a >> dd'able installation image. > > The .iso format has only served as an archive format, which you can > easily boot directly in qemu. > > You can also use 7zip in windows to extract the files and run > syslinux.exe. I doubt that is ever done though. > > Maybe a dd'able isohybrid or something would work? > > But we will also need some storage on the bootable media in case you > want to run diskeless. for some storage on dd'able boot media from > isohybrid would require user to create a second partition for apkovl. > > If we have an dd'able boot image with vfat file system we will also > need add a second partition for apkovl as fat does not support resize. > > If we do dd'able boot media that is not fat, but ext4 or similar, then > we lose the ability to copy the apkovl on a windows system. > > For UEFI we will probably need separate boot partition on fat anyway? > > Is it possible to create a dd'able image file which has a GPT which can > resize the data storage partition? > > -nc > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---