Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [94.23.1.103]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A95978110E for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:16:06 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpwn.com; s=key1; t=1642713364; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2fq24W/PPFtY4zMaiR3TCXkkPma4WYfy54+1y+lzi1g=; b=Syviox+wZNrpJ5JBRvXvLnjDYyWuDtxfvZnRmVV86AAxeBKpgG8SNXJj4fEZ1T+qk7jaRH amp3AtR89OXv3Zg4V/8pPCPHnEquvY9E1OSVkyI7BaCp9j7jHQpYQlVrCNUprNJFwCsgoK hjMB+OFJPYZLT4+eoYfMtE0z0nSxGMUX74HzfAOjpxoxkmLfnq8PPiyVR1pVBisU46UsHV Aw042OISTJLyfSJ2v4lm5cZA7qSy+11LCs75VqI323ELEwQ7hQtrU1xCZwXJ8UiWTwhlpr mqVwgtWr3Mj7dbA3RO/hy0AQmAgTF48GKpEFsB3Qsc59WaajUTzDUUFeRW8ZPA== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 22:16:03 +0100 Message-Id: Cc: "Nulo" , <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org> Subject: Re: Experiencing harmful behavior in Alpine X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Drew DeVault" To: "Ariadne Conill" References: <20220120180617.rvboyscx2oz5r3wu@x69> <1ea6351e-e958-78d6-9b92-fcde35a52d@dereferenced.org> In-Reply-To: <1ea6351e-e958-78d6-9b92-fcde35a52d@dereferenced.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: cmpwn.com On Thu Jan 20, 2022 at 10:07 PM CET, Ariadne Conill wrote: > Unfortunately, the TSC does not have the authority to enforce the Code of= =20 > Conduct, this is retained by the Alpine Council, for good reason. When= =20 > developing the new governance structure, it was our intent that there be= =20 > an ability to validate that TSC members are also following the Code of=20 > Conduct, which requires a separate team without conflicts of interest. I was not aware that the council existed until now, and indeed it seems like a more appropriate venue. I'm also going to ask that the following tickets are prioritized: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/3 https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/8 https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/9 There is not really sufficient communication around what's going on with Alpine governance as of late. > But, admittedly, I am not happy with this either, both because Nulo's=20 > concern has not been addressed by our current workflows, and because ther= e=20 > is no actual way to request a CoC inquiry. Both of these things should b= e=20 > addressed. Can you open another ticket for the Council to amend the CoC to define the redress procedures?