Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63])
	by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50792780DD5
	for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ayaya.dev; s=key1;
	t=1658334004;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=jpWld3km37IYQlJJEQxkVS9CkQr8r4Sdcna77h1nV9E=;
	b=VvfDAE9aEI7He17k0qMbjX1qAqLNvKFeeKuXSLLDlDv2xtoJP0GasDFMmIDatPsbn1/Qdi
	/9HdxTr6SEjUoAHw4WeTiwjz1IVgtDyO0s7gqMtUJfA1yGedgEyO44vrDLw3bZFOYymu9/
	zIX09FvBNc2Vx0I2YyDtxu3b6zlYsOs=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:20:02 +0200
Message-Id: <CLKMCBSCX00K.1S54O2EBT28QF@sumire>
Subject: Re: Does alpine violate rust's trademark?
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
From: "alice" <alice@ayaya.dev>
To: "Wolf" <wolf@wolfsden.cz>, <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
References: <YtWObVGbNcr8JkV2@ws>
In-Reply-To: <YtWObVGbNcr8JkV2@ws>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
X-Migadu-Auth-User: ayaya.dev

On Mon Jul 18, 2022 at 6:46 PM CEST, Wolf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to inquire about the `community/rust' package. After
> reading this [0] fun debate bug thread over at debian bug tracker, I've
> started to wonder what is the state of this in alpine.
>
> It looks like at least some of the patches in community/rust do not fall
> under any of these categories (from [1]):
>
>  - porting the software to a different architecture
>  - fixing local paths
>  - adding patches that have been released upstream
>  - adding patches that have been reported upstream, provided that the
>    patch is removed if it is not accepted upstream
>
> That seems to mean that distributing this package under the name `rust'
> is not really legal.
>
> Was any evaluation of if the trademark is being broken done? Do we want
> to rename `rust' to `totally-not-rust' or something? Do we want to do
> nothing and pretend the problem does not exist?
as the foundation says themselves[0], you should ask them, not alpine.

>> Please do not approach users of the trademarks with a complaint. That
>> should be left to the Rust Foundation and its representatives. Thanks!

[0]: https://foundation.rust-lang.org/policies/logo-policy-and-media-guide/=
#helping-out

>
> IANAL, so I've decided to ask here assuming someone else knows more
> about this.
>
> W.
>
> 0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1013920
> 1: https://foundation.rust-lang.org/policies/logo-policy-and-media-guide/
>
> --=20
> There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
> cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.