Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:267::]) by gbr-app-1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED0022372D for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ayaya.dev; s=key1; t=1674208056; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ouv3fCMsvrneDjohFScjuB9pbL6gytSYxkeXs0M0c5c=; b=BrIecZyw6zi5VdETHcCH8NnJ9dGmGh6bhnujBas6+jMbtTqYWZlrhvGp8t2i9LxQhxZjGs PlPB9JignoqdHfM0Z4SDl+fP4Awt3+mS55jjZEvGx5Vzq9hOhGrPYkbiZJJSTCJWkHqo2t P0+XS5fYrg/s2Z8osEtw3g38yPZ0fFA= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:47:35 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: suggesting feature, splitting pkgs repositories (part II) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "alice" To: , <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org> References: <3535e75e-f682-7435-a1f4-cd6d38180cfc@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3535e75e-f682-7435-a1f4-cd6d38180cfc@gmail.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Thu Jan 19, 2023 at 6:38 PM CET, V.Krishn wrote: > > Hi! > > Would like to suggest moving -dbg pkgs in repositories into a separate=20 > folder. eg. > main/aarch64.dbg or community/aarch64.dbg/ > OR > main.dbg/aarch64 or community.dbg/aarch64 > > Suggested change is desirable because: > 1. Users who would want to install -dbg pkgs are willing to do=20 > debugging. They are mostly development oriented. this is a downgrade because you now need to add more repositories to instal= l -dbg packages. this is, of course, assuming it's even possible to split subpackages into another repository in the first place. > 2. Mirrors may opt to ignore these .dbg folder, thereby saving some disk= =20 > space. they can already do this with excludes passed to the rsync command. so, what is the benefit? 1) isn't one (more steps to install -dbg packages for users, no upside?) 2) is already true ...2a) the reason not every package has -dbg is because of master mirror sp= ace limitations- but how the folders are structured doesn't change the fact the master mirror will have every -dbg package on it. the reason not everything= has a -dbg is not related to third party mirrors whatsoever. of course, being able to host packages on more than one master server is a separate engineer= ing problem, and would be nice for reasons not related to this proposal (and wo= uld also make it redundant anyway). as far as i can see, this has *zero* practical upside, for any party involv= ed: the master mirror, third party mirrors, or users. i guess you want this to have more -dbg packages (though you don't mention that); getting those is not impacted by this extra repository layout at all= . > > -- > Regards, > V.Krishn