Subject: [alpine-devel] blog post - 'long term support considered harmful'

From: systmkor <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:23:24 -0800

I came across an interesting blog post and was curious what you guys thought.

http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful <http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful>

—
keybase.io/systmkor

---

From: Natanael Copa <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:56:45 +0100

On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:23:24 -0800
systmkor <[email-masked]> wrote:

> *

That is interesting indeed. I think it would be very convenient to only
support 2 stable branches. I am not sure how that would work in
practice though.

I would like to split the aports tree and provide longer time support
(2 years) for only a small set of packages rather than try support it
all.

-nc

---
Unsubscribe:  [email-masked]
Help:         [email-masked]
---