Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C3F781172 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id 148FFC01C; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:43:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nautica.notk.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E14C009; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:43:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 5aedf91a; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:42:46 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Natanael Copa Cc: Tomas Kolda , ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: Native Alpine GLibc support (NEW) Message-ID: References: <20220621095653.71773d59@ncopa-desktop.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220621095653.71773d59@ncopa-desktop.lan> Natanael Copa wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:56:53AM +0200: > And this might also be of interest: > https://twitter.com/ariadneconill/status/1527642520167108609 I assume this tweet refers to these two, if anyone else is curious and wants to save 5 minutes searching: https://github.com/chainguard-dev/melange and https://github.com/chainguard-dev/apko (With that said, I agree improving musl might be better, but.. any reason to stick to alpine for this particular usecase? I don't know what you need to rebuild your JNI dependencies but it might be even less work to slim down another distro's container) -- Asmadeus | Dominique Martinet