Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:22:05 -0600 (CST)
From: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>
To: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
cc: Ariadne Conill <ariadne@dereferenced.org>, Nulo <catdevnull@riseup.net>, 
    ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: Experiencing harmful behavior in Alpine
In-Reply-To: <CHATAD7I9AYJ.1ID1PM0NIXZTC@taiga>
Message-ID: <a58f92d7-ab12-354d-afac-50cf917096aa@dereferenced.org>
References: <20220120180617.rvboyscx2oz5r3wu@x69> <CHAQ5YXL78AH.SFWXKZAYHBF8@taiga> <1ea6351e-e958-78d6-9b92-fcde35a52d@dereferenced.org> <CHATAD7I9AYJ.1ID1PM0NIXZTC@taiga>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

Hi,

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Drew DeVault wrote:

> On Thu Jan 20, 2022 at 10:07 PM CET, Ariadne Conill wrote:
>> Unfortunately, the TSC does not have the authority to enforce the Code of
>> Conduct, this is retained by the Alpine Council, for good reason.  When
>> developing the new governance structure, it was our intent that there be
>> an ability to validate that TSC members are also following the Code of
>> Conduct, which requires a separate team without conflicts of interest.
>
> I was not aware that the council existed until now, and indeed it seems
> like a more appropriate venue.

The new governance structure was launched at AlpineConf 2021, but 
admittedly there has not been much of an announcement since then.  I think 
this is because the Council has been busy dealing with more urgent 
governance issues and wanted to wait on an announcement until everything 
was polished.

> I'm also going to ask that the following tickets are prioritized:
> https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/3
> https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/8
> https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/9
>
> There is not really sufficient communication around what's going on with
> Alpine governance as of late.
>
>> But, admittedly, I am not happy with this either, both because Nulo's
>> concern has not been addressed by our current workflows, and because there
>> is no actual way to request a CoC inquiry.  Both of these things should be
>> addressed.
>
> Can you open another ticket for the Council to amend the CoC to define
> the redress procedures?

This seems reasonable.  I have opened a work item to update the CoC, 
including redress procedures:

https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/12

Ariadne