> This "simply" modification put a burden on the infrastructure side.
> Considered the minimum benefit of this, compared with the difficulties related to handling this "simply" modification, I don't think is worthy at all.

Ok, thank you Francesco for answering.

I had just hoped it might not imply more than creating a symlink
for the next release when doing a stable release.
Never mind if it'a a more complicated thing, or the infrastructure would
replicate the whole tree instead of just mirroring the symlink.

(The idea of course came from how branches may be followed
 through their release cycle with codenames like "bullseye" in debian.)

Kind regards
-Al