Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [66.245.176.36]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85FFD782BA8 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CBC58B74 for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yavin4.bsod.eu (unknown [172.21.190.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: francesco@bsod.eu) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D024558B6E for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:01:13 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:01:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.13.0 From: "Francesco Colista" Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposed change: drop busybox iproute2, always use real iproute2 To: ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org In-Reply-To: References: >> I would like to propose that we drop busybox iproute2, in favor of=0A>= > always using real iproute2.=0A=0AI disagree, sharing the same thought t= he other devs have expressed.=0Ahttps://alpinelinux.org/ : Small, Simple,= Secure.=0A=0ALet's stick to this goal.=0A=0A.: Francesco Colista=0A.: Al= pine Linux Core Dev Team