Received: from mx1.mailbun.net (mx1.mailbun.net [170.39.20.100]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0BDA78112B for <~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [172.58.104.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ariadne@dereferenced.org) by mx1.mailbun.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42D9411AF8F; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:56:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dereferenced.org; s=mailbun; t=1642715776; bh=UOBdprA0nCy6M5mOv/SciAlQSlHNwJF8sA7PiauLanc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ijbrKL5BxbdPTuPwK9IAHdhagJI7DgeWjycE4pQ2a3lRSqeEZyDGwW2Zu6Y/P33Rw tFr9eNu5FUrctyVDlKSNqT8GjwrLu7LwA5sCkYAGuT0AJYaVpV9rj1sB8c6yvITp6d QEnFGyJlpnpR85EbJSJ4YXryBrm58MpEGzB/YSqm2ZhjUFKNo+zjy5OAaR479UYYhQ 5gfnfDorzo01Ka+XyF+87vtNBhY2hYCYhwVwqxAwQdKOjWIRrGKrCqX4DtXNHp2KLD uk0gcCYlZbXl6bFcXiOyq56YDpoY5xiLeCtTeHtIJh+DNLCbgdg3OWcu4aAJlf0iEm 5TVq/WBVudADA== Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:56:09 -0600 (CST) From: Ariadne Conill To: Nico Schottelius cc: Ariadne Conill , Nulo , ~alpine/devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: Experiencing harmful behavior in Alpine In-Reply-To: <875yqeozlk.fsf@ungleich.ch> Message-ID: References: <20220120180617.rvboyscx2oz5r3wu@x69> <87ee522q7x.fsf@ungleich.ch> <20220120204412.6ormplwhusy32enq@x69> <5ea29d77-220-e420-c619-3faf72b786d@dereferenced.org> <875yqeozlk.fsf@ungleich.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi, On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Nico Schottelius wrote: > Ariadne Conill writes: >> [ ... ] >> For future reference, issues can be raised with the Council on the >> Council's issue tracker: >> >> https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/new > > Everyone who knows me knows I'm all for transparency, but if it was me > trying to reach out to the CoC for reporting misconduct / misbehaviour, > I would not feel properly protected. > > I suggest to have an email address of the CoC to reach out > instead. Whether or not that is backed by some encrypted archive or is > automatically deleted after resolultion is a different matter to be > discussed. Gitlab allows opening "private" bugs. It is intended that users would open CoC inquiry requests as private bugs, and the Council (or a future CoC team) would declassify them when a decision is made. Ariadne