DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=toastin.space; h=subject:to
	:references:cc:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=ml; b=cfto+SEN
	BJFhquo8tGYsZ5dfPOFjrzwAwmMUHGtafWDDHZ5EB1Flalq8itGSWmbpNudxZtSZ
	IaHGL8GrWDddTR5EKcZWfzlGPxh5zqylhosdLkgct/pSfkyuSHjUU5uv5wDTSO7q
	s/zDGo2RaEApqHY+vVPPx1Sii7iX3ZkOoAqi09Lxy1OMSz+y5Xcw6x1tYqF8U+bX
	m3gHu4InxIpFoKGBhp7/1uz0rluHZJw2u1xF+wrm4So2AwTkM4n6b0pQIlgyH7cn
	lZs5NtmgUEUVSVmb3lueVeDeoTF47bbBXZ/Zxo3r34eJrEAlQt/KTDo4rWDXs/zs
	mOWcZJ5BZuZukQ==
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Stripping down the governance model proposal
To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org
References: <20190415152330.GG1179@homura.localdomain>
 <c5146728-ebc1-f90b-4333-6871c4402c6d@toastin.space>
 <0fdde07c-b505-fb2a-cff2-bba494c781e3@lohutok.net>
 <0712b237-864e-5304-f4e3-695d0a5207c6@toastin.space>
 <20190419074630.GA2636@eddy.kbs.local>
Cc: Consus <consus@ftml.net>
From: Chloe Kudryavtsev <toast@toastin.space>
Message-ID: <e8b33e85-ce2a-ecf9-4182-a6b1eda5bb06@toastin.space>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:13:53 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/67.0
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190419074630.GA2636@eddy.kbs.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/19/2019 3:46 AM, Consus wrote:
> I don't have a say on this topic, but there is a possibility that no one
> followed it because there is no real need in at this moment.

Most members (and contributors) I've spoken to all agree that there are 
some significant problems that need addressing.
These problems aren't really new either (see above in the thread - the 
bullet point list is actually something that was worked on and agreed by 
multiple people).

One way of potentially seeing it is that the interim policy did not do 
enough to actually solve the problems, and thus it wasn't followed.
However, this seems unlikely to me.
The policy was effectively posted "as-is" to the ML by a developer (who 
has now left), and there didn't seem to have been much discussion on it.
Further, being only present on the ML, it ended up being buried under, 
well, everything else, and hard to even know about for new contributors.

I'm trying to avoid both of these by inviting literally anyone with 
something to say about it to have their say, and by (once ratified) 
having a living document in docs.a.o (currently beta.docs.a.o) that 
keeps it in an easily accessible place.

In short, "there is no real need in[sic] at this moment" doesn't really 
seem accurate to me.


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---