X-Original-To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.wilcox-tech.com [45.32.83.9]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B445C5D91 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:27:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 26846 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2018 20:27:46 -0000 Received: from 107-131-85-28.lightspeed.tulsok.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.237?) (awilcox@wilcox-tech.com@107.131.85.28) by mail.wilcox-tech.com with ESMTPA; 9 Feb 2018 20:27:46 -0000 Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Proposed change: openssl 1.1 as default system openssl implementation To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org References: <20180209211237.19ab8fda@ncopa-macbook.copa.dup.pw> From: "A. Wilcox" Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?Ad=c3=a9lie_Linux?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 14:27:57 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 X-Mailinglist: alpine-devel Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b32onEpGn7bi81aR1RwlqO49Pj2IlNlu5" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --b32onEpGn7bi81aR1RwlqO49Pj2IlNlu5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nCqefn05SjdPmxAd9mgs5nxk69hkUMaVA"; protected-headers="v1" From: "A. Wilcox" To: alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Proposed change: openssl 1.1 as default system openssl implementation References: <20180209211237.19ab8fda@ncopa-macbook.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: --nCqefn05SjdPmxAd9mgs5nxk69hkUMaVA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/09/18 14:15, William Pitcock wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Natanael Copa w= rote: >> I just learned that the time_t issue is resolved: >> https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/362ffef32c0fcae703= d57838e9f5704240a63213 >=20 > According to who? They just try to make the math still work with > time_t. The only way to be truly conformant is to use TAI64N math. That also doesn't help with things like Qt 5, py-cryptography <1.9, kamailio, rust/cargo, kleopatra, ... Also, some of the patches Alpine carries are already showing age by bringing packages to 2.5 API. As LibreSSL's ABI continues to churn, these patches will need to be further maintained. Some upstreams do not care or want to deal with it, and indeed some upstreams are dead with no good replacements yet. The maintenance burden for a project as small as Alpine seems disproportionate to the benefits LibreSSL would bring. But at the end of the day, I suppose it isn't my call. --arw --=20 A. Wilcox (awilfox) Project Lead, Ad=C3=A9lie Linux http://adelielinux.org --nCqefn05SjdPmxAd9mgs5nxk69hkUMaVA-- --b32onEpGn7bi81aR1RwlqO49Pj2IlNlu5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJMBAEBCAA2FiEEjNyWOYPU1SaTSMHHyynLUZIrnRQFAlp+BE0YHGF3aWxmb3hA YWRlbGllbGludXgub3JnAAoJEMspy1GSK50UVcsP/36AAfTNZ0AFTb8pRtcivboa QHwy/7XE3y4c9iFfjlKflBIU4rEXh83GV0WyqvZ8LzeXT5XFEUJ8sYXqufHZLbDs FWGGUKQdQA/ljWAYhHMladeiFsQJXABFVy1X3p/vDVjb/V0HS7hoi1K2sRmGsFgy VFTSsofA1LS6fpLBumb/cbRo8oqbe2y4dyIWE9W36TDSeveevjvJ3ZzjNkSueSdE sndsEyvlIhousjQ3SmMCZ6p/IVNjYYaFuwg586XIWEstUDCXuoulQSVwcimhW4Hl v5s+GemCyrrjMQUr2wvnF84+TQB/Gu1h80lxpisknBDQOwqIipcdy9d/ATGXnAUT gYmV3UxbEErF0tRM70vXFLlZH0YZTKu/Rf6xwMIRYKYPER5K6tNrYVsuR8K3A8+P 9Y3JLUWD0JtTYdLdfGoo/xW+yjHzn6/XUhF5qAx9+j4PZNZKCfQySbmUOtpzGqD4 tYew0nf7kJrsjxhsjMonfo1tQi7yp8yh+xBYF24dTWiUUhO7vc6nq6kwHNL5RANB 3sXei+XeR2MY5nC4qYH8Cu0mlWsEwL/+lVVHA2bOtGQ3/70kyTvtKMZ2L2sbPrqj ngR+JwNzrKAd6Z0itBiiX+siAa5IwKCzK/5mN38JzI1mC4ZlbNqtPx14TrOYMqOr Us666HTr7J+eWgvrHREt =RjHD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b32onEpGn7bi81aR1RwlqO49Pj2IlNlu5-- --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---