From: "Laurent Bercot" <ska-devel@skarnet.org>
To: "alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org" <alpine-devel@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Subject: Re: [alpine-devel] Alpine features and the future
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 23:32:32 +0000
Message-Id: <emb8f5c577-c9f9-4317-bea1-6b7fac8ecd3a@elzian>
In-Reply-To: <20171205220328.GA22370@miku>
References: <663B8B1D-79B7-42AE-8B25-A76E821FA54D@shiz.me>
 <AF447C7F-0CE8-4871-8420-A9D317B7F929@shiz.me> <20171205000347.GA26330@homura>
 <5728B3BC-F0EA-4430-942F-54F2512564C3@shiz.me> <20171205220328.GA22370@miku>
Reply-To: "Laurent Bercot" <ska-devel@skarnet.org>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.1.30794.0
Precedence: list
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>- execline is stupid

  You don't have to use it if you don't like it. It's used internally
by s6, but it can remain out of your sight at all times.


>- s6-rc is not very good
>- anopa is not very good
>- s6 is too complicated in places, things like "actually down" with
>  daemon-level support are inelegant and bad

  If you have constructive criticism, we'd welcome your input on the
supervision at list.skarnet.org mailing-list, or the #s6 channel on
Freenode (where anopa's author also lurks).
  I'm especially interested in what you find "not very good" with
s6-rc, and how you think it could improve. Aside from a friendlier UI,
which is something that a lot of people, including Alpine core devs,
have requested, and that is on the roadmap.

--
  Laurent



---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---