Does it makes any sense to ship a precompiled dwm at all?
from the http://dwm.suckless.org/ under "Differences":
> Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s
> pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase
> small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions.
I changed the url to: "http://dwm.suckless.org" (with http:// prefix)
and applied it.
Thanks!
-nc
---
Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---
+arch="all"+license="MIT/X"+depends=""+depends_dev=""+makedepends="$depends_dev libx11-dev libxinerama-dev"+install=""+subpackages="$pkgname-doc"+source="http://dl.suckless.org/dwm/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz"++_builddir="$srcdir"/dwm-$pkgver+prepare() {+ local i+ cd "$_builddir"+ for i in $source; do+ case $i in+ *.patch) msg $i; patch -p1 -i "$srcdir"/$i || return 1;;+ esac+ done+}++build() {+ cd "$_builddir"+ make || return 1+}++package() {+ cd "$_builddir"+ make PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR="$pkgdir" install || return 1+ rm -f "$pkgdir"/usr/lib/*.la+}++md5sums="8bb00d4142259beb11e13473b81c0857 dwm-6.0.tar.gz"+sha256sums="b2b9483de69259eeea56844899bb2385158d3e79a42d82b10c142099fc8eeb56 dwm-6.0.tar.gz"+sha512sums="895d1d363b3756c9ba19dbf06af34be753c1ae5971d540113d7f8901ad174c2e5944ef769b43e65f7b700f34832bb24082bc91d999b287610c9925182ce70c00 dwm-6.0.tar.gz"
--
2.0.2
---
Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---