X-Original-To: alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org
Delivered-To: alpine-infra@mail.alpinelinux.org
Received: from mail.wtbts.no (mail.wtbts.no [213.234.126.131])
	by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D888DC007B
	for <alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:19:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2D7AE4004;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Yes
Received: from mail.wtbts.no ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bsna.nor.wtbts.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 9V7KRYTuq4AW; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:19:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ytre.org (extmail.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.72.14])
	by mail.wtbts.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31051AE4001;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:19:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ytre.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130BB6167D351;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:19:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net (ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net [10.65.65.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: ncopa@ytre.org)
	by mail.ytre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D77B760AB6E32;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:19:21 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:19:21 +0100
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com>
Cc: alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: Securepass integration for Alpine Linux
Message-ID: <20111116131921.34638e1b@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHwjr354yPwTSOfAT1wZK7PzmpeoJa+Vq4F_fj+Ppt+KyEOOxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20111116105206.6380417a@ncopa-desktop.nor.wtbts.net>
	<CAHwjr354yPwTSOfAT1wZK7PzmpeoJa+Vq4F_fj+Ppt+KyEOOxQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:54:23 -0500
Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Natanael,
> 
> If all we're going to be using it for is SSO, then I'd prefer to keep
> that type of infra in-house (my 2cents).

+1

I still ask since this might be a "lazy" way out of it and might give
us some marketing

> I've got a setup for ldap
> figured out now with openldap + phpldapadmin that'll run on one box,
> but just need to polish it a bit before deploying to a primary and
> backup a.o server.  We could then use that for SSO for a.o services.

great!

I'm mostly worried about a polished user account creation and password
reset mechanism.

-nc