X-Original-To: alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org
Received: from newmail.tetrasec.net (unknown [172.21.74.12])
	by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8A55C440E
	for <alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org>; Wed,  8 Mar 2017 09:40:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (15.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.15])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org)
	by newmail.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58DAA5A0876;
	Wed,  8 Mar 2017 09:40:42 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:40:38 +0100
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: Jakub Jirutka <jakub@jirutka.cz>
Cc: alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: Alpine aport iperf has been flagged out of date
Message-ID: <20170308104038.3a58bb94@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
In-Reply-To: <A7CF26AF-2EAB-4EB4-8543-00205FDEF2F1@jirutka.cz>
References: <20170307170047.1996b37b@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw>
	<A7CF26AF-2EAB-4EB4-8543-00205FDEF2F1@jirutka.cz>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:01:59 +0100
Jakub Jirutka <jakub@jirutka.cz> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> yes, that would be probably useful.
>=20
> I*ve fixed name of the mapped package on Anitya to iperf3. However,
> why we still have an old 2.x version as *iperf* and the current one
> as *iperf3*?

Looks like it is two different things.

"This code is a continuation based from the no longer maintained iperf
2.0.5 code base. . . . In summary, the Iperf2 code here attempts to
maintain the iperf 2.0.5 feature set and backward compatibility. . .

Iperf 2 vs iperf 3 major differences: Iperf 3 is a rewrite which does
not support interoperability with iperf 2."

https://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf2/

-nc

>=20
> Jakub
>=20
> > On 7. Mar 2017, at 17:00, Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
> > wrote:
> >=20
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > I wonder if we can include an url to the project in Anitya that
> > triggered the flag?
> >=20
> > https://release-monitoring.org/projects/search/?pattern=3Diperf
> >=20
> > In this case it seems like it was
> > https://release-monitoring.org/project/1389/
> >=20
> > -nc
> >=20
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >=20
> > Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:15:31 -0000
> > From: Alpine Package DB <pkgs@alpinelinux.org>
> > To: ncopa@alpinelinux.org
> > Subject: Alpine aport iperf has been flagged out of date
> >=20
> >=20
> > Dear Natanael Copa
> >=20
> > This is an automatic message send from pkgs.alpinelinux.org
> > You are receiving this message because you are the maintainer of
> > aport:
> >=20
> > iperf
> >=20
> > abump iperf-3.1.7
> >=20
> > The following message is send by: Alpine Package DB
> > <pkgs@alpinelinux.org>
> >=20
> > This package has been flagged automatically on the basis of
> > notification from Anitya <https://release-monitoring.org/>.
> >=20
> > Please note that integration with Anitya is in experimental phase.
> > If the provided information is incorrect, please let us know on IRC
> > or alpine-infra@alpinelinux.org. Thanks!
> >=20
> >=20
> >  =20
>=20
>=20