X-Original-To: alpine-infra@lists.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-infra@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB37DC00A7 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 08:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hr11so370863vcb.5 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=crj8Bi2xxA1pqvDEwtQG6GHNsyjJneFmTLz6sOkUtNs=; b=vrERn7LxrFyZE2vcc0izke4Mk2gtrCVXRrfZ9llsUttZXQAGavCqKKEz5WEg/+6xPO 1inY6zKnmxoMZO47k7UXdnclxABdA9bo7Mppx7XIf3+texziDDncPlFvoK9Ya7GDq47K pPgsO0rA8/N6uMU5/9RsjKjarlaxVh3Q2M58W3B+hr00fHP+/lkQsYWU4Tnsp9T2YKLt P0Fnzxi9bAvgH3v8EYbs17Dm19tdce7YM7rAxK2coYGiruSLGOQMAsktIsSCz/Fd//yi eGSCnmjr/FK5EicBo2SxT+qWl9t5SJHH+5xV1GPOa3mt0lenkh8hjZuUARq7637kJe0G xgtw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.182.71 with SMTP id ec7mr14805655vdc.64.1368435001471; Mon, 13 May 2013 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.164.199 with HTTP; Mon, 13 May 2013 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1368434005.8951.37.camel@df1844j> References: <1368434005.8951.37.camel@df1844j> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: http acceleration for www and wiki From: Carlo Landmeter To: Leonardo Arena Cc: alpine-infra@lists.alpinelinux.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Leonardo Arena wrote: > > Hi, > > i'm looking at https://www.cloudflare.com/plans and wondering about > setting up the free version for www and wiki. Free version does not > support SSL. I can see the benefits from this service, but I thought we prefer using our own in-house implementations? > > Sometime ago we chatted about setting up a varnish box, so I was > thinking if we could spare a box and use this service instead. I don't remember seeing this conversation, any short summary about this chat? > > It's not the same thing, but could it be enough? > > - leo > > > >