Hello everyone,

I recently installed Alpine on a dedicated server using LVM for root and
swap partitions. But after some benchmarks, I noticed that the hard disk
speed of my new Alpine install was noticeably slower then on other
distro (Archinux and Debian in this case).

I then ran more benchmarks using `fio`. Here is my methodology and the
benchs results:

# Benchmark commands:
     Read:
         fio --name=alpine-read --ioengine=posixaio --rw=read --bs=4k
         --numjobs=1 --size=4g --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based
         --end_fsync=1
     Write:
         fio --name=alpine-write --ioengine=posixaio --rw=write --bs=4k
         --numjobs=1 --size=4g --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based
         --end_fsync=1

# Benchmark setups:

## Server:
     Hardware specs:
         - GPT on a BIOS only capable motherboard with a `lvmsys`
           Alpine install
         - Hardware raid1 - HP SmartArray p222

     Alpine - LVM:
         READ: bw=154MiB/s (162MB/s)
         WRITE: bw=86.3MiB/s (90.5MB/s)

     Archlinux - LVM (Alpine LVM partitions mounted on archlinux liveCD):
         READ: bw=236MiB/s (247MB/s)
         WRITE: bw=126MiB/s (132MB/s)

## VM (VirtualBox):
     Hardware specs:
         - Basic `lvmsys` Alpine install on a laptop with a NVMe SSD

     Alpine - LVM:
         READ: bw=96.2MiB/s (101MB/s)
         WRITE: bw=93.5MiB/s (98.0MB/s)

     Archlinux - LVM (Alpine LVM partitions mounted on archlinux liveCD):
         READ: bw=354MiB/s (371MB/s)
         WRITE: bw=237MiB/s (248MB/s)

As you can see, Alpine performances are quite bad, is this an expected
behavior ?

If it's not, where should I try to look for a fix ? Kernel config ? LVM
using musl ?

-- 
Sevan

Hello,

On Wednesday, December 2, 2020 11:21:30 AM MST Sevan wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I recently installed Alpine on a dedicated server using LVM for root and
> swap partitions. But after some benchmarks, I noticed that the hard disk
> speed of my new Alpine install was noticeably slower then on other
> distro (Archinux and Debian in this case).
> 
> I then ran more benchmarks using `fio`. Here is my methodology and the
> benchs results:
> 
> # Benchmark commands:
>      Read:
>          fio --name=alpine-read --ioengine=posixaio --rw=read --bs=4k
>          --numjobs=1 --size=4g --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based
>          --end_fsync=1
>      Write:
>          fio --name=alpine-write --ioengine=posixaio --rw=write --bs=4k
>          --numjobs=1 --size=4g --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based
>          --end_fsync=1
> 
> # Benchmark setups:
> 
> ## Server:
>      Hardware specs:
>          - GPT on a BIOS only capable motherboard with a `lvmsys`
>            Alpine install
>          - Hardware raid1 - HP SmartArray p222
> 
>      Alpine - LVM:
>          READ: bw=154MiB/s (162MB/s)
>          WRITE: bw=86.3MiB/s (90.5MB/s)
> 
>      Archlinux - LVM (Alpine LVM partitions mounted on archlinux liveCD):
>          READ: bw=236MiB/s (247MB/s)
>          WRITE: bw=126MiB/s (132MB/s)
> 
> ## VM (VirtualBox):
>      Hardware specs:
>          - Basic `lvmsys` Alpine install on a laptop with a NVMe SSD
> 
>      Alpine - LVM:
>          READ: bw=96.2MiB/s (101MB/s)
>          WRITE: bw=93.5MiB/s (98.0MB/s)
> 
>      Archlinux - LVM (Alpine LVM partitions mounted on archlinux liveCD):
>          READ: bw=354MiB/s (371MB/s)
>          WRITE: bw=237MiB/s (248MB/s)
> 
> As you can see, Alpine performances are quite bad, is this an expected
> behavior ?
> 
> If it's not, where should I try to look for a fix ? Kernel config ? LVM
> using musl ?

Two things you may want to try.

Make sure write cache is enabled: sdparm -s WCE=y /dev/sda (or whatever your 
RAID volume is).

Secondly, Alpine uses mq-deadline scheduler by default on rotational media, 
this trades linear read/write performance for better seek latencies.  You 
might try using kyber scheduler instead: echo kyber > /sys/block/sda/queue/
scheduler

Ariadne