Received: from mx0.riseup.net (mx0.riseup.net [198.252.153.6]) by gbr-app-1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1452237F6 for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 09:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fews01-sea.riseup.net (fews01-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fnr3Z5VkJz9s1w for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 09:32:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1775295162; bh=CCnns0lI1jNRNOYfua2I8RXpSmM0HFU5zHzVtutA1XI=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=em2ozx5kYB8H7ZLZ0SHWMt3VL8H4ejtGWFBnCzmvQrC+KUHpKjX5xOMzu/0KVwD6z V1bXsBw7n+5ueZ4mRzZxH4Jhlga5LR4nWRREaigqZfAeYtwsIveziidU4E2ZLUw7Dl qLjZ6R1Ljm6wpohoZLqUnaOlNdQhLC1uwE8s1wnc= X-Riseup-User-ID: E1BA5CE9E47BE4A514630A1B5F8CC80D9BAC5690ADE40C60728F70F4C5EA9178 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews01-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4fnr3Z0lGFz233P for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Sat, 4 Apr 2026 09:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0a012799b4793f0e8f5f54a843bf8e6094807238.camel@riseup.net> Subject: Re: Why'd you go with Alpine Linux? From: Ralf Mardorf To: ~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:32:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9a06befe-edba-45af-8226-487b26b8564f@web.de> References: <2838510e48dd7564e67dcb67562b968ccc4a9724.camel@riseup.net> <9a06befe-edba-45af-8226-487b26b8564f@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2026-04-03 at 08:47 +0200, Wolfgang Klein wrote: > I think you should try a setup like the one I described and see for > yourself that KDE is not as "bloated" as you might remember it. Hi, I wasn't aware that KDE had become more lightweight. Still, I'm not interested in KDE, since I generally only use window managers without desktop environments. I also have a few issues with KDE, such as the problem with those old-fashioned green external hard drives. In GTK environments, gvfs constantly causes these old green hard drives to spin up and down. The solution is to not install gvfs or, if necessary, use a dummy package to pretend it=E2=80=99s installed so the dependencies are met= . There=E2=80=99s also a mechanism in KDE that causes this nonsense, but I=E2= =80=99ve never been able to find it. The problem with the green drives isn=E2=80=99t really that bad for me anymore, since I only have one of them and, fortunately, many others that don=E2=80=99t force standby mode. If you want= to buy external drives today, you have to write a script anyway to prevent them from going into standby mode so that no I/O errors occur. So the problem with gvfs and whatever is going on with KDE is actually a thing of the past. I recently wanted to reorder new enclosures for external hard drives, but my favorites are no longer available, and every manufacturer I contacted confirmed that they no longer make drives that spin continuously, nowadays they all force standby mode. But there=E2=80=99= s something else that=E2=80=99s pretty annoying. Here=E2=80=99s a workaround = for Ardour under KDE on X: https://manual.ardour.org/ardour-configuration/system-speci= fic-setup/kde-plasma-5/ . Other programs are affected as well. And there are a few other things I don=E2=80=99t like. As I said, I prefer simple window managers without additional layers on top, and I do a lot of things by command line anyway. Bashisms (=C2=A0https://mywiki.wooledge.org/Bashism ) clearly don= =E2=80=99t belong in scripts, but they=E2=80=99re sometimes useful for working in the command line. That saves me from having to use a file manager. Regards, Ralf