Received: from mail.regrow.earth (mail.regrow.earth [176.9.44.231]) by gbr-app-1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72019223B50 for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 07:46:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=regrow.earth; s=2024-11-19; t=1754293565; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i9VdJtQ6ygOlfP4Yc6D5svrMvDdneqlyLblGpB/WeIg=; b=dQrltXLG45riHNj+YyMtP345dHAhxi1U5EHqQERzV0FQNIwixaHVucKGxS7BJ3OzmA7cpU iBrVDwFOGhRGZCzik25sxnV9ZV6l0bpHgzfO7Jlr5gx7YpRIFONyzusSZB4FmoNPUOpTxn PDEyt1Dc6vT5h2q3FtxjOWy2sLvH/uHEJYFpqm0wuj5MhSONoMs5rAF9Fy3QON8cfQjaIW XSR2DRaAFKvf5V4qbq6Sr1Pywt0y8ZwwoVohxIQcUuwmSkVo6CysGYHimQmJ3DHgVkBh3I bfcIrusPBT2uNeeuRFc/UXLiLb05aUH9Jj+MJulEeJek7ue2R+yxY+X8YKj9lw== Received: by mail.regrow.earth (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id aefd4679 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 4 Aug 2025 07:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 09:46:04 +0200 (GMT+02:00) From: Unicorn To: spoon@keemail.me Cc: Camelia Lavender , ~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org Message-ID: <0b875790-7585-406d-8c5e-9492734982e0@regrow.earth> In-Reply-To: References: <5297f63e-53ba-4591-837b-aac9436cb4d9@camelia.dev> Subject: Re: Thinking about using Alpine edge on my desktop, how stable is it? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <0b875790-7585-406d-8c5e-9492734982e0@regrow.earth> Hi! >> - In your experience, with proper maintenance (regular system >> upgrades, updating configuration files, etc.), did Alpine edge >> (*without* the testing repository enabled) often break in the past? >> - Same question but *with* the testing repository enabled? I've been running Alpine Edge as my everyday OS on a laptop for a few years without any bad breakage (also after loving it on a VPS ;) ). From what I remember, there was a bootloader (grub) related issue once, which I was not affected by due to using a different bootloader, as well as a few dependency conflict issues, only one of which affected me but didn't cause any major issues. I have used a couple of packages pinned from testing in all that time so I can't say how much the experience without it differs. I have not had to rescue my system with a USB for anything that I didn't personally misconfigure :) > Alpine is not a desktop distro. It's only practical use is in > containers and servers. You are gonna have a hard time doing anything > productive if you use it for desktop. Better stick to Arch or Fedora > for desktop. For my own use I disagree, Alpine with sway as a window manager has been great for me and have no plans of changing - in the end, you will have to see for yourself whether it fulfills your needs and isn't too inconvenient because it is a very manual setup process. I personally like it but it is not a finished out of the box experience like many other distros. Worth noting also is that Alpine is musl-libc based, meaning that random downloaded binaries, as well as AppImage applications likely won't work. Flatpak works great but this difference is something to be aware of, it depends a lot on what software you need. Best, Edin