X-Original-To: alpine-user@mail.alpinelinux.org Delivered-To: alpine-user@mail.alpinelinux.org Received: from mail.alpinelinux.org (dallas-a1.alpinelinux.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713FFDC098F for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.tetrasec.net (unknown [74.117.189.116]) by mail.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B45DDC03C0 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org (unknown [79.160.13.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: n@tanael.org) by newmail.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E9F45A15A8; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:06:59 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:17:31 +0100 From: Natanael Copa To: Donald Allen Cc: alpine-user@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-user] A suggestion and two questions Message-ID: <20151114181731.6041e290@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) X-Mailinglist: alpine-user Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Hi, On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:14:23 -0500 Donald Allen wrote: > I am experimenting with Alpine and while I am very pleased with the > stability and performance of the system, I've encountered some > frustrations in getting questions answered. I would like to suggest > that the 'Forums' link on the main alpinelinux.org and other pages be > removed. The 'Community' link takes you to a page that provides > descriptions and links to *all* options for communicating with the > Alpine community, including the forums, together in one place, as they > should be. The presence of the separate 'Forums' link, prominently > displayed near the 'wiki' link, is a confusing distraction; it can > give a sense that the forums are the main way (or the only way, if the > 'forums' link catches your eye first, as it did mine) to talk to the > Alpine community. This is clearly not the case; answers to questions > are not forthcoming there, as I expressed in frustration in my last > post. This is a good point. We should change that. > > My questions: the package browser indicates that there are both tcl > and tk (8.6) packages available in the 'main' repository. However, > only the tcl package is present in the main repositories on the > dl[2-5] mirrors. So my first question is why is the tk package > missing? I don't think tk is missing: http://dl-3.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/main/x86_64/tk-8.6.4-r0.apk Maybe you were looking in the stable repositories? Seems like tk moved to main repo 2015-06-09, after v3.2 was branched: http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/commit/?id=c5afb05a2f9e0b6919d1614f283d36cde3a0e317 > The second question is why does the package browser say one > thing and the repository another? One would think that the database > used by the browser would be generated from the ultimate source of the > truth, namely the repositories. Maybe because package browser only shows packages in edge (development), and not in the stable (production) repositories? -nc > > /Don Allen > > > --- > Unsubscribe: alpine-user+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org > Help: alpine-user+help@lists.alpinelinux.org > --- > --- Unsubscribe: alpine-user+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-user+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---