X-Original-To: alpine-user@lists.alpinelinux.org Received: from mailauth4.nine.ch (mailauth4.nine.ch [94.230.211.190]) by lists.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E615C5726 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:45:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailauth4.nine.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FE6C02E6 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:45:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailauth4.nine.ch X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=disabled Received: from mailauth4.nine.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailauth4.nine.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tn0C7-kPUJR4 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vimes (224-82-241-84.dyn.cable.fcom.ch [84.241.82.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pf@1042.ch) by mailauth4.nine.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vimes (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E06D1806EB; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:45:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:45:17 +0200 From: Jean-Louis Fuchs To: alpine-user@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: [alpine-user] AlpineLinux on Banana Pi? Message-ID: <20180418144517.GE4949@vimes.1042.ch> References: <20180410185723.Yr9az%steffen@sdaoden.eu> X-Mailinglist: alpine-user Precedence: list List-Id: Alpine Development List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180410185723.Yr9az%steffen@sdaoden.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Hi Steffen On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:57:23PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Thus my question: does anyone have experience with Banana Pi, does > it work with AlpineLinux? Will patches to enable zstd also there Well even the state of the linux-rpi is not too good. It has deviated from the official raspi-kernel too much. https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux 1. Not being up to date 2. Not being close enough to defconfig make bcmrpi_defconfig (for raspi 1 and 0) make bcm2709_defconfig (for raspi 2) make bcmrpi3_defconfig (64bit for raspi 3, aarch64) https://bugs.alpinelinux.org/issues/6370 I recently decided to try again to build a kernel for the raspi that is more close. You can cross compile on alpine using aports/scripts/bootstrap.sh $ARCH You can also use https://github.com/multiarch/qemu-user-static to test packages, which is not relevant to the kernel, but interesting if you need to compile user-space programs. If you build a kernel for yourself using abuild its quite fast, you can be sloppy here and there. If you plan to submit the kernel to alpine its going to be a lot of work (see aports/linux-vanilla) and issue 6370. > Will patches to enable zstd also there be accepted? If the Banana Pi hardware is so badly upstreamed like Raspberry Pi you have to create linux-bpi. If it is close enough to Raspberry Pi and I ever submit my Raspi-Kernel to Alpine, patches are probably ok. > What about a browser. Etc. etc. :-)) > What do you say? Anyone? I had no problems browsing with the raspi because of memory [1], the problem was that linux-rpi does not support OpenGL and it was not smooth. Again see issue 6370. [1] 32-bit and musl-libc save a lot of memory. Best, Jean-Louis --- Unsubscribe: alpine-user+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-user+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---