Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [74.117.190.25]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A2E782BCF for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D64B9E347F; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alpine@tanael.org) by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F9669E1BCD; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:38:22 +0200 From: Natanael Copa To: PICCORO McKAY Lenz Cc: alpine-user Subject: Re: su/login and util-linux Message-ID: <20190719073822.7f5075b0@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:36:52 -0400 PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > I read recently that su and login are build from util-linux in most > distributions.. > > Alpine linux builds currently from suckless implementation.. Looks like we have 3 su implementations: busybox, shadow, and ubase (suckless). > Taking in consideration the extra work that produce it! will implement > the behaviour of the default from util-linux or will go ahead withthe > suckless defaults ? I'm not sure I understand your question. Alpine default `su` uses busybox implementation, but requires bbsuid to work. If this is not sufficient for you, you can install either `shadow` or `ubase`. > That mail are due seem will be a standar now! I didn't understand this. sorry. > > Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) > http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com