Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mx1.tetrasec.net [66.245.176.36])
	by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C607378187F
	for <alpine-user@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Thu,  1 Oct 2020 12:35:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.tetrasec.net (mail.local [127.0.0.1])
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E6311C04D;
	Thu,  1 Oct 2020 12:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ncopa-desktop.lan (67.63.200.37.customer.cdi.no [37.200.63.67])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: alpine@tanael.org)
	by mx1.tetrasec.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72D6F11C04C;
	Thu,  1 Oct 2020 12:35:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:35:33 +0200
From: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
To: PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com>
Cc: alpine-user <alpine-user@lists.alpinelinux.org>
Subject: Re: did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
Message-ID: <20201001143533.69590193@ncopa-desktop.lan>
In-Reply-To: <CALci+FQj9GCoP9=Q0gLnQNgoccjRAcZLuNQdwhV-1cZQ8FndJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALci+FQj9GCoP9=Q0gLnQNgoccjRAcZLuNQdwhV-1cZQ8FndJQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.7 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430
PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote:

> did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard

Hi!

Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100%

-nc