<CALci+FQj9GCoP9=Q0gLnQNgoccjRAcZLuNQdwhV-1cZQ8FndJQ@mail.gmail.com>
did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
<20201001143533.69590193@ncopa-desktop.lan>
<CALci+FQj9GCoP9=Q0gLnQNgoccjRAcZLuNQdwhV-1cZQ8FndJQ@mail.gmail.com>
(view parent)
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430 PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote: > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever? > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard Hi! Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100% -nc
<CALci+FTw+0Hg=zhtU3r62N4KdZj1Uj6n=wZGSrAs7LqrR0qytQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20201001143533.69590193@ncopa-desktop.lan>
(view parent)
so the fusion that systemd proposed as /usr/bin -> /bin and etc etc will be in the future? /var/run will be /run now? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:35, Natanael Copa ( ncopa@alpinelinux.org) escribió: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430 > PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote: > > > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard > > Hi! > > Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100% > > -nc >
<0486de6d-328a-2670-bc35-53f5e8dc69fb@geoghegan.ca>
<CALci+FTw+0Hg=zhtU3r62N4KdZj1Uj6n=wZGSrAs7LqrR0qytQ@mail.gmail.com>
(view parent)
Alpine doesnt use systemd On 2020-10-01 14:44, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > so the fusion that systemd proposed as /usr/bin -> /bin and etc etc > will be in the future? /var/run will be /run now? > > Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) > http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com > > > El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:35, Natanael Copa > (ncopa@alpinelinux.org <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>) escribió: > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430 > PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com > <mckaygerhard@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard > > Hi! > > Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100% > > -nc >
<20201014082134.72689c58@ncopa-desktop.lan>
<CALci+FTw+0Hg=zhtU3r62N4KdZj1Uj6n=wZGSrAs7LqrR0qytQ@mail.gmail.com>
(view parent)
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:44:57 -0400 PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote: > so the fusion that systemd proposed as /usr/bin -> /bin and etc etc will be > in the future? No. FHS 3.0 has /bin[1] and /usr/bin[2] separate: [1]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch03s04.html [2]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s04.html > /var/run will be /run now? Yes. It already is and has been for a while. /var/run[3] is (should be) a symlink to /run[4]. [3]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch05s13.html [4]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch03s15.html -nc > > Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) > http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com > > > El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:35, Natanael Copa ( > ncopa@alpinelinux.org) escribió: > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430 > > PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever? > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard > > > > Hi! > > > > Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100% > > > > -nc > >