~alpine/users

4 3

did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?

PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<CALci+FQj9GCoP9=Q0gLnQNgoccjRAcZLuNQdwhV-1cZQ8FndJQ@mail.gmail.com>
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
Details
Message ID
<20201001143533.69590193@ncopa-desktop.lan>
In-Reply-To
<CALci+FQj9GCoP9=Q0gLnQNgoccjRAcZLuNQdwhV-1cZQ8FndJQ@mail.gmail.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430
PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote:

> did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard

Hi!

Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100%

-nc
PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<CALci+FTw+0Hg=zhtU3r62N4KdZj1Uj6n=wZGSrAs7LqrR0qytQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20201001143533.69590193@ncopa-desktop.lan> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
so the fusion that systemd proposed as /usr/bin -> /bin and etc etc will be
in the future? /var/run will be /run now?

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com


El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:35, Natanael Copa (
ncopa@alpinelinux.org) escribió:

> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430
> PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard
>
> Hi!
>
> Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100%
>
> -nc
>
Jordan Geoghegan <jordan@geoghegan.ca>
Details
Message ID
<0486de6d-328a-2670-bc35-53f5e8dc69fb@geoghegan.ca>
In-Reply-To
<CALci+FTw+0Hg=zhtU3r62N4KdZj1Uj6n=wZGSrAs7LqrR0qytQ@mail.gmail.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Alpine doesnt use systemd


On 2020-10-01 14:44, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> so the fusion that systemd proposed as /usr/bin -> /bin and etc etc 
> will be in the future? /var/run will be /run now?
>
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
>
>
> El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:35, Natanael Copa 
> (ncopa@alpinelinux.org <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>) escribió:
>
>     On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430
>     PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com
>     <mckaygerhard@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
>     > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard
>
>     Hi!
>
>     Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100%
>
>     -nc
>
Details
Message ID
<20201014082134.72689c58@ncopa-desktop.lan>
In-Reply-To
<CALci+FTw+0Hg=zhtU3r62N4KdZj1Uj6n=wZGSrAs7LqrR0qytQ@mail.gmail.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:44:57 -0400
PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote:

> so the fusion that systemd proposed as /usr/bin -> /bin and etc etc will be
> in the future? 

No. FHS 3.0 has /bin[1] and /usr/bin[2] separate:

[1]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch03s04.html
[2]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s04.html

> /var/run will be /run now?

Yes. It already is and has been for a while. /var/run[3] is (should be) a symlink to /run[4].

[3]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch05s13.html
[4]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch03s15.html

-nc


> 
> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 08:35, Natanael Copa (
> ncopa@alpinelinux.org) escribió:
> 
> > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:29:05 -0430
> > PICCORO McKAY Lenz <mckaygerhard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > did alpine follows FHS 3.0 or whatever?
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard  
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Yes we mostly follow FHS 3.0, but I don't think we do it 100%
> >
> > -nc
> >  
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)