Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [94.23.1.103]) by nld3-dev1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBC9780225 for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:03:32 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ayaya.dev; s=key1; t=1666037011; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cNhBTxIuauP/opoKrJDhy3WtLpAMeQ8ZSi2lQyMNY7I=; b=qyhJd6dpcKGzMx5qoJnL5SfYZdAV3pYcH72ih4aRe9MF54DVxB12jp6bk/9Xi7O+Ok7CUR 9+9QHm20aOpJyaL7WLoISVcfZsG6SketGP3DgVgV71cRexd1sw/stRQvRNWJRVmpHEHywY 43MIInNSOoxnmKttK80rNAVJtgGendY= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:03:25 +0200 Message-Id: X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "alice" To: "Ariadne Conill" Cc: "Riccardo Mottola" , "Winston Weinert" , <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org> Subject: Re: ipw2100 wifi card firmware References: <005dc987-0461-9189-383e-d690b7686e96@ml1.net> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Mon Oct 17, 2022 at 9:28 PM CEST, Ariadne Conill wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, alice wrote: > > > On Mon Oct 17, 2022 at 9:07 PM CEST, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > >> Hi Winston, > >> > >> I was unable to download the firmware directly from sourceforge.net, m= y > >> browser(s) continue to fail the accept test! > >> However, I did as you suggested: got the Debian package, "ar x" and th= en > >> tar the data file... put the firmware in /lib/firmware... and yes, my > >> ThinkPad connects to the wireless, the WiFi LED lights up. > >> > >> I wonder why Alpine cannot have such a package? I have seen other > >> non-free firmware (how much I hate that... a reason why I skipped all > >> those "libre" distributions: without binary blobs a laptop is almost > >> useless nowadays). > > alpine doesn't ship anything non-free, with really the only exception > > being firmware under the "linux-firmware" project umbrella (and anythin= g > > overlooked, of course). that project (afaik) has the vendors adding > > firmware to it by petitioning it directly, and it's more or less a > > community consensus that it gets a pass since otherwise nothing is > > really usable at all. that part is the distinction from "libre" distros > > that ship nothing and let you use them on like 5 laptops (maybe a bit > > harsh, but you know what i mean). > > > > but as for everything else, it is all free software. no shortcuts there= . > > > > as for the ipw2x00 firmware, the licence isn't really much different th= an a > > lot of things in linux-firmware: > > > > ipw2100 firmware license For OEMs, IHVs, and ISVs: > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > > > > LICENSE. This Software is licensed for use only in conjunction with > > Intel component products. Use of the Software in conjunction with > > non-Intel component products is not licensed hereunder. Subject to the > > terms of this Agreement, Intel grants to you a nonexclusive, > > nontransferable, worldwide, fully paid-up license under Intel's > > copyrights to: (i) copy the Software internally for your own developmen= t > > and maintenance purposes; (ii) copy and distribute the Software to your > > end-users, but only under a license agreement with terms at least as > > restrictive as those contained in Intel's Final, Single User License > > Agreement, attached as Exhibit A; and (iii) modify, copy and distribute > > the end-user documentation which may accompany the Software, but only i= n > > association with the Software. > > > > but it's still nonfree. i guess adding it to the repositories would > > require the same exemption linux-firmware does. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware= .git/ > > (read the various LICENSE.* files in there) > > I think it would be better if Intel just submitted it to linux-firmware= =20 > instead. "just" is certainly doing a lot of heavy lifting there. i wouldn't mind perhaps sending an email somewhere, but i don't really know where to even start aside from generic-corporate-support-address or very-specific-personal-email-to-intel-linux-engineer-via-lkml (bad). i doubt they'd do it anyway, but it's worth a try if there's a non-generic point of contact you can point me to. > > Ariadne