Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) by gbr-app-1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C834F225920 for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X82sp25WMzDqXv for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:40:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1726674030; bh=tex2j7XEHXRLanpTts93VjTZnvBV8Xm3LKRhKEfkcLo=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BSpJud7h7ZOZjnMpinS0ZitRI+Wf6BPgLKEEA6IpCzuD7esE2eqjEXHYx9TLR8SJ4 gPW5Q6gds+6lBcYJ+gLB6ZkUpSaZZw8KLyvvbWZzbhp98gxbHNnHwKZbTaWDdFWMvR reo5eLUR1YNPOcxHy6Sa2iUKwSApv9s7YAHTtKgU= X-Riseup-User-ID: 55F61021437AB8BBB40B2FAD3B4AC1550135F1E13F487ACC6EEA8E0A9FB74335 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X82sn5zy1zFtdM for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Discussion - Is Alpine Linux still a more secure Linux Distribution compared to its compatriots From: Ralf Mardorf To: ~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:40:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <5ed4f8e4e4952161908a9d9f25aaf10283159264.camel@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 PPS: I was struggling with whether or not to write it. the following is not meant as a silly joke, nor as a political statement. Which is safer, a smartphone or a pager? What I'm getting at is that the biggest security flaw of all is believing that there is a best solution.