Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:39:22 +0200
From: =?utf-8?B?0KHRgtGA0LDRhdC40ZrQsCDQoNCw0LTQuNGb?= <sr@strahinja.org>
To: ~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org
Subject: Re: Discussion - Is Alpine Linux still a more secure Linux
 Distribution compared to its compatriots
Message-ID: <a4pp3scglo54gjzcbv44llz5pqw3yvsca5zfu4jeqpd2gxngb7@nsf6evjvuyen>
References: <O74GIpz--B-9@tuta.io>
 <5ed4f8e4e4952161908a9d9f25aaf10283159264.camel@riseup.net>
 <b2cd80332ea09b1d76825b78598c270debc72821.camel@riseup.net>
 <a10bf73ab7d3fc9c1143159adf9821ab7e76b693.camel@riseup.net>
 <O77otH---B-9@tuta.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <O77otH---B-9@tuta.io>

Дана 24/09/19 07:48AM, kdmw.629@tuta.io написа:
> A smartphone can also be safe

It can't, by its nature and design. Wireless (WiFi and "mobile data")
transmission is much easier to eavesdrop on, and is inherently
insecure. All smartphones are surveillance devices.


> Use only signal or telegram

Both insecure, because they use centralized servers, which can collect
all the data. Something like the P2P Tox protocol, with real end-to-end
encryption, is better in terms of security, but still not ideal. As 
someone replied, there is no absolute security.


> and talk in code even on signal or telegram

This is one of the oldest forms of encryption,[1] which is also perhaps
the easiest to crack.


[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption#Ancient