Received: from trent.utfs.org (trent.utfs.org [IPv6:2a03:3680:0:3::67]) by gbr-app-1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A575222039E for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by trent.utfs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0F35F76C; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 22:56:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 22:56:56 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Kujau To: Steffen Nurpmeso cc: alpine-user@lists.alpinelinux.org Subject: Re: linux-lts vs. linux-edge In-Reply-To: <20230131215124.wNEBv%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Message-ID: References: <11ef5892-ee4f-fab7-4eda-81eaca667ee8@nerdbynature.de> <20230131215124.wNEBv%steffen@sdaoden.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 31 Jan 2023, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > kernel.org still does not mention that 6.1.* is a LTS. That's right, kernel.org specifies 6.1.8 as stable, but their latest longterm (LTS) version is 5.15.90. So, maybe Alpine linux-lts could ship their longterm version instead? OTOH, that way I would have never stumbled across this bug :-) Thanks, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #344: Network failure - call NBC