Received: from submission1.atomicmail.io (submission1.atomicmail.io [89.127.215.218]) by gbr-app-1.alpinelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C3C2202AB for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail1.atomicmail.io [127.0.0.1]) by submission1.atomicmail.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4407D46A63 for <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:26:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=atomicmail.io; s=mail; t=1786955207; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=5w8w3GUKAaTuQNn8um6RjvZAisg8b3jUPc02xt67HeY=; b=Hn9YIrl97xTun/EhQaExrKXtxw+HPHjiqyHKbm5UDSwz2n/UUDH56ntn4+HCtEAZE3Sxov n5V4akvHCqugjYNRq4RUk0pmYsFk4KUni3mXRL8FfUNih4ED87rMUB7s5mZOpMwCLjnvO8 B3M6USpAyg2/0QmO9nVuCiqPQ41Y+Sh4qXTC+pPO/AS1atmVrqnqZR/GZK4elOEFFzHWJt XZDitrWs6i9Z4/hE8TlqRVDDrcbno8Gldx0ViwDaAXWW1ZwLKZ72BBsN+wnfiP+KyQp8MW ok88WRK17TPpYVB5NGfZ51lKfOjYcOBdo7/KlmP272eeaayOWw1CyHqPDgWZtg== From: Gilbert To: "~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org" <~alpine/users@lists.alpinelinux.org> Subject: Alpine 'virt' iso offline and VM choice Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:26:31 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_NmP-06e760d4771fecca-Part_1" ----_NmP-06e760d4771fecca-Part_1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I want to install Alpine in a VM for a local server. I noticed that the 'virt' iso can't be installed on disk without = downloading some packages from the internet. That's annoying. What's the = rationale behind that? If I used the 'extended' iso instead, would I be = missing something compared to 'virt'? It says the 'virt' iso is "optimized = for virtual systems", so I wonder if it has an advantage in terms of = performance or resource usage. ----_NmP-06e760d4771fecca-Part_1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I want to install Alpine in a VM for a = local server.

I noticed that the 'virt' iso can't be = installed on disk without downloading some packages from the internet. = That's annoying. What's the rationale behind that?

If I used = the 'extended' iso instead, would I be missing something compared to 'virt'= ?
It says the 'virt' iso is "optimized for virtual systems", so I= wonder if it has an advantage in terms of performance or resource usage.=
=20 ----_NmP-06e760d4771fecca-Part_1--