Mail archive
alpine-devel

Re: [alpine-devel] Proposal: Multi-Arch matrix builds on travis-ci

From: Michael Wyraz <michael_at_wyraz.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:10:21 +0200

I did my tests with QEMU 3.0:

x86_64: 48s
armhf via qemu: 334s

so far away from "ok" ;-/

Am 21.09.18 um 21:44 schrieb Jean-Louis Fuchs:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, at 11:17, Jakub Jirutka wrote:
>
>> I didn't use it in aports intentionally, because it's *very* slow. Many
>> aports would fail to build due to exceeding the time limit (50 minutes)
>> and it would significantly increase waiting time for all builds (due to
>> exhausted job queue).
> There was or is bug in qemu-user-static, that made it terribly slow. This version:
>
> $> ./qemu-arm-static --version
> qemu-arm version 2.9.1(qemu-2.9.1-2.fc26)
>
> is definitely ok, I haven't tested any newer ones. In my opinion most builds should not fail due time limit on travis. BUT the tests sometimes do, after all its not the correct kernel. I am moving towards qemu-system using netboot for my development. netboot boots surprisingly consistent across architectures. You can append apkovl= to provision the VM.
>
> Best,
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> Help: alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> ---
>


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Received on Fri Sep 21 2018 - 22:10:21 GMT