Mail archive
alpine-devel

Re: [alpine-devel] Proposal: Multi-Arch matrix builds on travis-ci

From: Jean-Louis Fuchs <ganwell_at_fangorn.ch>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:49:42 +0200

If you have the bug the ratio is far worse. You can use top to detemine
it, you‘d get like 1-10% for a build that uses all cores on x86.

On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, at 22:10, Michael Wyraz wrote:
> I did my tests with QEMU 3.0:
>
> x86_64: 48s
> armhf via qemu: 334s
>
> so far away from "ok" ;-/
>
> Am 21.09.18 um 21:44 schrieb Jean-Louis Fuchs:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, at 11:17, Jakub Jirutka wrote:
> >
> >> I didn't use it in aports intentionally, because it's *very*
> >> slow. Many> >> aports would fail to build due to exceeding the time limit (50
> >> minutes)> >> and it would significantly increase waiting time for all builds
> >> (due to> >> exhausted job queue).
> > There was or is bug in qemu-user-static, that made it terribly slow.
> > This version:> >
> > $> ./qemu-arm-static --version
> > qemu-arm version 2.9.1(qemu-2.9.1-2.fc26)
> >
> > is definitely ok, I haven't tested any newer ones. In my opinion
> > most builds should not fail due time limit on travis. BUT the tests
> > sometimes do, after all its not the correct kernel. I am moving
> > towards qemu-system using netboot for my development. netboot boots
> > surprisingly consistent across architectures. You can append apkovl=
> > to provision the VM.> >
> > Best,
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> > Help: alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> > ---
> >
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> Help: alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
> ---
>





---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help_at_lists.alpinelinux.org
---
Received on Fri Sep 21 2018 - 22:49:42 GMT