-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 25/10/17 18:36, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:17 PM, A. Wilcox
> <awilfox_at_adelielinux.org> wrote:
>> On 25/10/17 09:46, Natanael Copa wrote: This is INCREDIBLY
>> important to us at Adélie because for instance ppc64 BE requires
>> -fno-inline-small-functions due to GCC bug elsewise it will cause
>> ABI issues with long double.
> Maybe we should fix the specfiles to bring in
> -fno-inline-small-functions on ppc64/ppc64le?
> This seems like something that could hurt if you run into it on a
> ppc64 machine.
I plan on doing more regression testing with different versions and
builds of GCC (at least 5.x, 6.3, and 7.2 in addition to 6.4) to see
if this is a regression or where the bug was introduced. It would be
much better to find the root cause of this breakage and include a
patch to gcc than to work around it with a specfile.
Also, I have so far not run into any issues with ppc64 BE with
- -fno-inline-small-functions but that could be masking a more subtle
compiler bug. It's all quite scary, to be blunt... but such is life
with very untested code... don't think anyone has ever used
- -mabi=elfv2 with ppc64 before.
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wed Oct 25 2017 - 19:51:08 UTC