On Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:16am, "Natanael Copa" <email@example.com> said:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Matt Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:>> Yeah, the lua-pty option sounds pretty light-weight, as does "empty.">>>> I'm open to using either option, but I'm thinking "empty" might be a better fit?> > I'm ok with both. Depends on if you want do it with shell scripts or lua.
Honestly though, I would think most people would come more to knowing how to write a shell script than one in lua. Add to that, empty would be more shell-friendly.
However, what if both options were available to the user, and then they could:
- Use Lua + lua-pty exclusively.
- Use shell scripts + empty exclusively.
- Or mix and match.
- Matt Smith