~alpine/devel

2 2

Update the Code of Conduct

Details
Message ID
<A97934AC-998C-4D9D-9537-285F303C8B55@alpinelinux.org>
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hi,

There is a request to update the Code of Conduct.
https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/council/-/issues/12

The current Code of Conduct was created several years ago when we didn’t have anything. The thinking then was that its better with something, even if its not perfect, than not have any CoC at all. It was done at a time when there were ongoing community issues and it is always difficult to introduce this kind of things at a time when they are needed.

As pointed out in the issue above, the current CoC has several issues, so we should change it. But instead of trying to re-invent the wheel, why not use something pre-existing?

So the suggestion is to simply use the latest version of the contributor covenant:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct/

What do you think? Is this something could use? Is it good enough?

-nc
Details
Message ID
<CHYLQYD56GE7.2BOY61I1JO00V@sumire>
In-Reply-To
<A97934AC-998C-4D9D-9537-285F303C8B55@alpinelinux.org> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
> As pointed out in the issue above, the current CoC has several issues, so we should change it. But instead of trying to re-invent the wheel, why not use something pre-existing?
>
> So the suggestion is to simply use the latest version of the contributor covenant:
> https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct/
>
> What do you think? Is this something could use? Is it good enough?

Sounds good to me.

-- alice
Details
Message ID
<87czjjwbdh.fsf@ungleich.ch>
In-Reply-To
<A97934AC-998C-4D9D-9537-285F303C8B55@alpinelinux.org> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> writes:
> [...]
> So the suggestion is to simply use the latest version of the contributor covenant:
> https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct/
>
> What do you think? Is this something could use? Is it good enough?

Sounds very good to me, covers all important points and has a proper
license to use.

Cheers,

Nico

--
Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)