<EC3D1878-DB68-4C0F-AB32-A8E85F7CF902@gmail.com>
I came across an interesting blog post and was curious what you guys thought. http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful <http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful> — keybase.io/systmkor
<20150203165645.16a24551@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
<EC3D1878-DB68-4C0F-AB32-A8E85F7CF902@gmail.com>
(view parent)
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:23:24 -0800 systmkor <systmkor@gmail.com> wrote: > I came across an interesting blog post and was curious what you guys thought. > > http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful <http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful> > > * > keybase.io/systmkor That is interesting indeed. I think it would be very convenient to only support 2 stable branches. I am not sure how that would work in practice though. I would like to split the aports tree and provide longer time support (2 years) for only a small set of packages rather than try support it all. -nc --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org ---