Hi,
I tried to build it as it is posted but it fail.
Maybe consider using version from https://github.com/laurikari/tre/
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 10:04, Al-Hassan Abdel-Raouf wrote:
> https://laurikari.net/tre> POSIX compliant regexp matching library.> Includes agrep for approximate grepping.> ---> testing/tre/APKBUILD | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)> create mode 100644 testing/tre/APKBUILD> > diff --git a/testing/tre/APKBUILD b/testing/tre/APKBUILD> new file mode 100644> index 0000000000..4eb0e68fe4> --- /dev/null> +++ b/testing/tre/APKBUILD> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@> +# Contributor:> +# Maintainer:
It is not good idea to introduce package if no one intend to maintain
it.
> +pkgname=tre> +pkgver=0.8.0> +pkgrel=0> +pkgdesc="POSIX compliant regexp matching library. Includes agrep for approximate grepping."> +url="https://laurikari.net/tre"> +arch="all"> +license="BSD"> +depends="musl"
^^^^
This is not needed, it is by default.
> +subpackages="$pkgname-doc $pkgname-dev"> +source="https://laurikari.net/tre/tre-$pkgver.tar.bz2"> +> +build() {> + cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Also this is not needed, it is default
> + ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-static> + make
Keep these two aligned, i.e. equally indented
> +}> +> +package() {> + make DESTDIR="$pkgdir" install> +> +}> +> +sha512sums="db7465993e0d25eee8e52f974427b8a040234cf0f017769eb94ee88bc6261821336aad7f762bfa82db7e2212d8449bc221592586f061c528a59a550773cbc263 tre-0.8.0.tar.bz2"> -- > 2.28.0
i will fix error shortly,
but for other comments,
i would love to mantain that package whenever i am available, but for next couple of monthes i will not be available that much and the package maybe weeks behind if update comes in
the version on website is well tested and have less dependencies
and it's actually easier to build,
is it says any error msg? or any clue why it fail to build
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 15:18, Al-Hassan Abdel-Raouf wrote:
> i will fix error shortly,> > but for other comments,> i would love to mantain that package whenever i am available, but for next couple of monthes i will not be available that much and the package maybe weeks behind if update comes in
That is ok, especially with software which don't have errors.
Someone will upgrade or/and even fix it if you are not available.
So you can add yourself in Maintainer field without problem.
> the version on website is well tested and have less dependencies> and it's actually easier to build,> is it says any error msg? or any clue why it fail to build
I will put in gitlab.alpinelinux.org/aports where CI will try to build
it and show all errors or success.
BTW, gitlab.alpinelinux.org is preferred workflow for Alpine
development.
--
regards
Hi Al-Hassan,
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 17:09, Milan P. Stanić wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 15:18, Al-Hassan Abdel-Raouf wrote:> > i will fix error shortly,> > > > but for other comments,> > i would love to mantain that package whenever i am available, but for next couple of monthes i will not be available that much and the package maybe weeks behind if update comes in> > That is ok, especially with software which don't have errors.> Someone will upgrade or/and even fix it if you are not available.> So you can add yourself in Maintainer field without problem.> > > the version on website is well tested and have less dependencies> > and it's actually easier to build,> > is it says any error msg? or any clue why it fail to build> > I will put in gitlab.alpinelinux.org/aports where CI will try to build> it and show all errors or success.
Here is merge request:
https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/13610
You can see where it fails.
> BTW, gitlab.alpinelinux.org is preferred workflow for Alpine> development.
--
regards