~alpine/devel

1

[alpine-devel] blog post - 'long term support considered harmful'

systmkor
Details
Message ID
<EC3D1878-DB68-4C0F-AB32-A8E85F7CF902@gmail.com>
Sender timestamp
1422836604
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
I came across an interesting blog post and was curious what you guys thought.

http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful <http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful>

—
keybase.io/systmkor
Natanael Copa
Details
Message ID
<20150203165645.16a24551@ncopa-desktop.alpinelinux.org>
In-Reply-To
<EC3D1878-DB68-4C0F-AB32-A8E85F7CF902@gmail.com> (view parent)
Sender timestamp
1422979005
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:23:24 -0800
systmkor <systmkor@gmail.com> wrote:

> I came across an interesting blog post and was curious what you guys thought.
> 
> http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful <http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful>
> 
> *
> keybase.io/systmkor

That is interesting indeed. I think it would be very convenient to only
support 2 stable branches. I am not sure how that would work in
practice though.

I would like to split the aports tree and provide longer time support
(2 years) for only a small set of packages rather than try support it
all.

-nc


---
Unsubscribe:  alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org
Help:         alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org
---